<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 25/09/2023 18:14 BST Toby Manning via tournament-org <tournament-org@lists.britgo.org> wrote:
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<p>Please note that there is no specific requirement for any BGA system to be exactly cost-reflective. It makes sense for any levy system to be approximately "pass-through" - but it does not have to be exact. I fully agree that it is important that TD's are not unduly inconvenienced.</p>
<p>Irrespective of what final system the the EGF comes up with, we may decide to subsidise juniors, or first-time tournament entries, or anyone else. And it may be that we continue to ask TD's to ask for non-BGA members to confess on an honesty basis - and if some of them are dishonest, for the BGA itself to pick up the bill.</p>
</blockquote>
<div>
Obviously we are all discussing something that doesn't exist yet but let's suppose LOGC achieves its glory days of 100+, what's the ball park figure, please and, dishonesty aside, who would pay?
</div>
<div class="default-style">
</div>
<div class="default-style">
I still like the idea of an EGF passport and the FFG system.
</div>
<div class="default-style">
</div>
<div class="default-style">
Gerry
</div>
<div class="default-style">
</div>
<div class="default-style">
</div>
<div class="default-style">
</div>
</body>
</html>